NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Subjective Well-Being and Income: Is There Any Evidence of Satiation?

Betsey Stevenson, Justin Wolfers

NBER Working Paper No. 18992
Issued in April 2013
NBER Program(s):   DEV   EFG   LE   LS

Many scholars have argued that once "basic needs" have been met, higher income is no longer associated with higher in subjective well-being. We assess the validity of this claim in comparisons of both rich and poor countries, and also of rich and poor people within a country. Analyzing multiple datasets, multiple definitions of "basic needs" and multiple questions about well-being, we find no support for this claim. The relationship between well-being and income is roughly linear-log and does not diminish as incomes rise. If there is a satiation point, we are yet to reach it.

download in pdf format
   (1536 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w18992

Published: Betsey Stevenson & Justin Wolfers, 2013. "Subjective Well-Being and Income: Is There Any Evidence of Satiation?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(3), pages 598-604, May. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Stevenson and Wolfers w14282 Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox
Sacks, Stevenson, and Wolfers w16441 Subjective Well-Being, Income, Economic Development and Growth
Jones and Romer w15094 The New Kaldor Facts: Ideas, Institutions, Population, and Human Capital
Bordo and James w19112 The European Crisis in the Context of the History of Previous Financial Crises
Deaton w13317 Income, Aging, Health and Wellbeing Around the World: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Themes
Data
People
About

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us