Affirmative Action and University Fit: Evidence from Proposition 209

Peter Arcidiacono, Esteban Aucejo, Patrick Coate, V. Joseph Hotz

NBER Working Paper No. 18523
Issued in November 2012
NBER Program(s):   ED

Proposition 209 banned the use of racial preferences in admissions at public colleges in California. We analyze unique data for all applicants and enrollees within the University of California (UC) system before and after Prop 209. After Prop 209, graduation rates increased by 4.4%. We present evidence that certain institutions are better at graduating more-prepared students while other institutions are better at graduating less-prepared students and that these matching effects are particularly important for the bottom tail of the qualification distribution. We find that Prop 209 led to a more efficient sorting of minority students, explaining 18% of the graduation rate increase in our preferred specification. Further, universities appear to have responded to Prop 209 by investing more in their students, explaining between 23-64% of the graduation rate increase.

download in pdf format
   (439 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (439 K) or via email.

This paper was revised on September 19, 2013

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w18523

Published: Affirmative action and university fit: evidence from Proposition 209 Peter Arcidiacono12*, Esteban Aucejo3, Patrick Coate4 and V Joseph Hotz125 * Corresponding author: Peter Arcidiacono Author Affiliations For all author emails, please log on. IZA Journal of Labor Economics 2014, 3:7 doi:10.1186/2193-8997-3-7 Published: 15 September 2014

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Arcidiacono, Aucejo, and Hotz w18799 University Differences in the Graduation of Minorities in STEM Fields: Evidence from California
Rothstein and Yoon w14276 Affirmative Action in Law School Admissions: What Do Racial Preferences Do?
Card and Krueger w10366 Would the Elimination of Affirmative Action Affect Highly Qualified Minority Applicants? Evidence from California and Texas
Krishna and Tarasov w19546 Affirmative Action: One Size Does Not Fit All
Fang and Moro w15860 Theories of Statistical Discrimination and Affirmative Action: A Survey
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us