NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

NIH Peer Review: Challenges and Avenues for Reform

Pierre Azoulay, Joshua S. Graff Zivin, Gustavo Manso

NBER Working Paper No. 18116
Issued in June 2012
NBER Program(s):   PR

The National Institute of Health (NIH), through its extramural grant program, is the primary public funder of health-related research in the United States. Peer review at NIH is organized around the twin principles of investigator initiation and rigorous peer review, and this combination has long been a model that science funding agencies throughout the world seek to emulate. However, lean budgets and the rapidly changing ecosystem within which scientific inquiry takes place have led many to ask whether the peer-review practices inherited from the immediate post-war era are still well-suited to twenty first century realities. In this essay, we examine two salient issues: (1) the aging of the scientist population supported by NIH and (2) the innovativeness of the research supported by the institutes. We identify potential avenues for reform as well as a means for implementing and evaluating them.

You may purchase this paper on-line in .pdf format from SSRN.com ($5) for electronic delivery.

Information about Free Papers

You should expect a free download if you are a subscriber, a corporate associate of the NBER, a journalist, an employee of the U.S. federal government with a ".GOV" domain name, or a resident of nearly any developing country or transition economy.

If you usually get free papers at work/university but do not at home, you can either connect to your work VPN or proxy (if any) or elect to have a link to the paper emailed to your work email address below. The email address must be connected to a subscribing college, university, or other subscribing institution. Gmail and other free email addresses will not have access.

E-mail:

Acknowledgments

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w18116

Published: National Institutes of Health Peer Review: Challenges and Avenues for Reform, Pierre Azoulay, Joshua S. Graff Zivin, Gustavo Manso. in Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 13, Lerner and Stern. 2013

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Jacob and Lefgren w13519 The Impact of Research Grant Funding on Scientific Productivity
Link and Ruhm w14057 Bringing Science to Market: Commercializing from NIH SBIR Awards
Azoulay, Graff Zivin, and Manso w15466 Incentives and Creativity: Evidence from the Academic Life Sciences
Azoulay, Graff Zivin, and Manso National Institutes of Health Peer Review: Challenges and Avenues for Reform
Depro, Timmins, and O'Neil w18109 Meeting Urban Housing Needs: Do People Really Come to the Nuisance?
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us