Was What Ail'd Ya' What Kill'd Ya'?
Making use of those Union Army veterans for whom death certificates are available, we compare the conditions with which they were diagnosed by Civil War pension surgeons to the causes of death on the certificates. We divide the data between those veterans who entered the pension system early because of war injuries and those who entered the pension system after the 1890 reform that made it available to many more veterans. We examine the correlation between specific conditions and death causes to gauge support for the hypothesis that death is attributable to something specific. We also examine the correlation between the accumulation of rated conditions to time until death to gauge support for the "insult hypothesis." In general, we find support for both hypotheses. Examining the hazard ratios for dying of a specific condition, there is support for the idea that what ail'd ya' is what kill'd ya'.
-
-
Copy CitationRobert W. Fogel, Louis Cain, Joseph Burton, and Brian Bettenhausen, "Was What Ail'd Ya' What Kill'd Ya'?," NBER Working Paper 17322 (2011), https://doi.org/10.3386/w17322.Download Citation
Published Versions
Fogel, Robert W. & Cain, Louis & Burton, Joseph & Bettenhausen, Brian, 2013. "Was what ailâd ya what killâd ya?," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 269-280. citation courtesy of 
Related
Programs
Working Groups
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
