Self Reported Disability and Reference Groups
NBER Working Paper No. 17153
Issued in June 2011
NBER Program(s): AG HE
Social networks and social interactions affect individual and social norms. We develop a direct test of this using Dutch survey data on how respondents evaluate work disability of hypothetical people with some work related health problem (vignettes). We analyze how the thresholds respondents use to decide what constitutes a (mild or more serious) work disability depend on the number of people receiving disability insurance benefits (DI) in their reference group. We find that reference group effects are significant and contribute substantially to an explanation of why self-reported work disability in the Netherlands is much higher than in, for example, the US.
The NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health provides summaries of publications like this.
You can sign up to receive the NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health by email.
Machine-readable bibliographic record -
Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w17153
Published: Self-Reported Disability and Reference Groups, Arthur van Soest, Tatiana Andreyeva, Arie Kapteyn, James P. Smith. in Investigations in the Economics of Aging, Wise. 2012
Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
|Kapteyn, Smith, and van Soest
||w15245 Work Disability, Work, and Justification Bias in Europe and the U.S.
|Cutler and Landrum
||w17148 Dimensions of Health in the Elderly Population
||w17697 The Unsustainable Rise of the Disability Rolls in the United States: Causes, Consequences, and Policy Options
|Kapteyn, Smith, van Soest, and Banks
||w13536 Labor Market Status and Transitions during the Pre-Retirement Years: Learning from International Differences
|Banks, Kapteyn, Smith, and van Soest
||Work Disability is a Pain in the ****, Especially in England, the Netherlands, and the United States