Optimal Portfolio Choice with Wage-Indexed Social Security
NBER Working Paper No. 17025
Issued in May 2011
NBER Program(s): AG AP PE
This paper re-examines the classic question of how a household should optimally allocate its portfolio between risky stocks and risk-free bonds over its lifecycle. We show that allowing for the wage indexation of social security benefits fundamentally alters the optimal decisions. Moreover, the optimal allocation is close to observed empirical behavior. Households, therefore, do not appear to be making large "mistakes," as sometimes believed. In fact, traditional financial planning advice, as embedded in "target date" funds - whose enormous recent growth has been encouraged by new government policy - often leads to even relatively larger "mistakes" and welfare losses.
The NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health provides summaries of publications like this.
You can sign up to receive the NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health by email.
Machine-readable bibliographic record -
Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w17025
Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
|Maurer, Mitchell, and Rogalla
||w15682 The Effect of Uncertain Labor Income and Social Security on Life-cycle Portfolios
|Pennacchi and Rastad
||w16456 Portfolio Allocation for Public Pension Funds
|Chai, Maurer, Mitchell, and Rogalla
||w17134 Lifecycle Impacts of the Financial and Economic Crisis on Household Optimal Consumption, Portfolio Choice, and Labor Supply
|Vogel, Ludwig, and Boersch-Supan
||w18856 Aging and Pension Reform: Extending the Retirement Age and Human Capital Formation
|Brown, Kapteyn, and Mitchell
||w17018 Framing Effects and Expected Social Security Claiming Behavior