NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

A Test of Racial Bias in Capital Sentencing

Alberto F. Alesina, Eliana La Ferrara

NBER Working Paper No. 16981
Issued in April 2011
NBER Program(s):   LE

We propose a test of bias based upon patterns of judicial errors. We model the trial court as minimizing a weighted sum of type I and II errors. We define racial bias a situation where the weight depends on defendant/victim race. If the court is unbiased, the error rate should be independent of the combination defendant/victim race. We test this prediction using an original dataset on all capital appeals in 1973-1995. We find that in the first and last stage of appeal the probability of error is 3 and 9 percentage points higher for minority defendants who killed white (vs. minority) victims.

download in pdf format
   (594 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (594 K) or via email.

This paper was revised on July 29, 2013

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w16981

“A Test for Racial Bias in Capital Punishment,” American Economic Review, Forthcoming 2014 (with Eliana La Ferrara).

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Ossa w16388 A 'New Trade' Theory of GATT/WTO Negotiations
Hungerman w16973 The Effect of Education on Religion: Evidence from Compulsory Schooling Laws
Costinot, Vogel, and Wang w16936 An Elementary Theory of Global Supply Chains
Bushway, Owens, and Piehl w16961 Sentencing Guidelines and Judicial Discretion: Quasi-experimental Evidence from Human Calculation Errors
Glaeser, Kessler, and Piehl w6602 What Do Prosecutors Maximize? An Analysis of Drug Offenders and Concurrent Jurisdiction
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us