What Explains the Lagged Investment Effect?
Working Paper 16889
DOI 10.3386/w16889
Issue Date
Revision Date
The best predictor of current investment at the firm level is lagged investment. This lagged-investment effect is empirically more important than the cash-flow and Q effects combined. We show that the specification of investment adjustment costs proposed by Christiano, Eichenbaum and Evans (2005) predicts the presence of a lagged-investment effect and that a generalized version of their model is consistent with the behavior of firm-level data from Compustat.
-
-
Copy CitationJanice C. Eberly, Sergio Rebelo, and Nicolas Vincent, "What Explains the Lagged Investment Effect?," NBER Working Paper 16889 (2011), https://doi.org/10.3386/w16889.
-
Published Versions
Eberly, Janice & Rebelo, Sergio & Vincent, Nicolas, 2012. "What explains the lagged-investment effect?," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 370-380. citation courtesy of