NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

School Admissions Reform in Chicago and England: Comparing Mechanisms by Their Vulnerability to Manipulation

Parag A. Pathak, Tayfun Sönmez

NBER Working Paper No. 16783
Issued in February 2011
NBER Program(s):   ED   LS   PE

In Fall 2009, officials from Chicago Public Schools changed their assignment mechanism for coveted spots at selective college preparatory high schools midstream. After asking about 14,000 applicants to submit their preferences for schools under one mechanism, the district asked them re-submit their preferences under a new mechanism. Officials were concerned that "high-scoring kids were being rejected simply because of the order in which they listed their college prep preferences" under the abandoned mechanism. What is somewhat puzzling is that the new mechanism is also manipulable. This paper introduces a method to compare mechanisms based on their vulnerability to manipulation. Under our notion, the old mechanism is more manipulable than the new Chicago mechanism. Indeed, the old Chicago mechanism is at least as manipulable as any other plausible mechanism. A number of similar transitions between mechanisms took place in England after the widely popular Boston mechanism was ruled illegal in 2007. Our approach provides support for these and other recent policy changes involving matching mechanisms.

download in pdf format
   (332 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (332 K) or via email.

Acknowledgments

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w16783

Published: Parag A. Pathak & Tayfun S�nmez, 2013. "School Admissions Reform in Chicago and England: Comparing Mechanisms by Their Vulnerability to Manipulation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(1), pages 80-106, February.

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Nunn w13367 The Long-Term Effects of Africa's Slave Trades
Abdulkadiroğlu, Pathak, and Roth w14864 Strategy-proofness versus Efficiency in Matching with Indifferences: Redesigning the New York City High School Match
Angrist, Oreopoulos, and Williams w16643 When Opportunity Knocks, Who Answers? New Evidence on College Achievement Awards
Naidu and Yuchtman w17051 Coercive Contract Enforcement: Law and the Labor Market in 19th Century Industrial Britain
Black, Devereux, and Salvanes w10911 Fast Times at Ridgemont High? The Effect of Compulsory Schooling Laws on Teenage Births
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us