NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Jockeying for Position: Strategic High School Choice Under Texas' Top Ten Percent Plan

Julie Berry Cullen, Mark C. Long, Randall Reback

NBER Working Paper No. 16663
Issued in January 2011
NBER Program(s):   CH   ED   LS   PE

Beginning in 1998, all students in the state of Texas who graduated in the top ten percent of their high school classes were guaranteed admission to any in-state public higher education institution, including the flagships. While the goal of this policy is to improve college access for disadvantaged and minority students, the use of a school-specific standard to determine eligibility could have unintended consequences. Students may increase their chances of being in the top ten percent by choosing a high school with lower-achieving peers. Our analysis of students’ school transitions between 8th and 10th grade three years before and after the policy change reveals that this incentive influences enrollment choices in the anticipated direction. Among the subset of students with both motive and opportunity for strategic high school choice, as many as 25 percent enroll in a different high school to improve the chances of being in the top ten percent. Strategic students tend to choose the neighborhood high school in lieu of more competitive magnet schools and, regardless of own race, typically displace minority students from the top ten percent pool. The net effect of strategic behavior is to slightly decrease minority students’ representation in the pool.

download in pdf format
   (273 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (273 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w16663

Published: Cullen, Julie Berry & Long, Mark C. & Reback, Randall, 2013. "Jockeying for position: Strategic high school choice under Texas' top ten percent plan," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 32-48. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Fletcher and Mayer w18721 Tracing the Effects of Guaranteed Admission through the College Process: Evidence from a Policy Discontinuity in the Texas 10% Plan
Feyrer and Sacerdote w16759 Did the Stimulus Stimulate? Real Time Estimates of the Effects of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
Hsieh and Ossa w16778 A Global View of Productivity Growth in China
Mian, Sufi, and Trebbi w16685 Foreclosures, House Prices, and the Real Economy
Cullen and Reback w12286 Tinkering Toward Accolades: School Gaming Under a Performance Accountability System
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us