NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

US Trade and Wages: The Misleading Implications of Conventional Trade Theory

Lawrence Edwards, Robert Z. Lawrence

NBER Working Paper No. 16106
Issued in June 2010
NBER Program(s):   ITI

Conventional trade theory, which combines the Heckscher-Ohlin theory and the Stolper-Samuelson theorem, implies that expanded trade between developed and developing countries will increase wage inequality in the developed countries. This theory is widely applied. It serves as the basis for estimating the impact of trade on wages using two-sector simulation models and the net factor content of trade. It leads naturally to the presumption that the rapid growth and declining relative prices of US manufactured imports from developing countries since the 1990s have been a powerful source of increased US wage inequality.

In this study we present evidence that suggests the presumption is not warranted. We highlight the sensitivity of conventional theory to the assumption of incomplete specialization and find evidence that is not consistent with it. Since 1987, although US domestic relative effective prices in industries with relatively high shares of manufactured goods imports from developing countries have declined, effective unskilled worker–weighted prices have actually risen relative to skilled worker–weighted prices. If anything, this suggests pressures for increased wage equality. Also in apparent contradiction to theory, the (six-digit North American Industry Classification System [NAICS]) US manufacturing industries with high shares of manufactured imports from developing countries are actually more skill intensive than the industries with high shares of imports from developed countries. Finally, applying a two-stage regression procedure, we find that developing-country import price changes have not mandated increased US wage inequality. While these results conflict with standard theory, they are easily explained if the United States and developing countries have specialized in products and tasks that are highly imperfect substitutes. If this is the case, the impact of increased trade with developing countries on US wage inequality is far more muted than standard theory suggests. Also methodologies such as the net factor content of trade using US production coefficients and simulation models assuming perfect substitution between imports and domestic products could be highly misleading.

download in pdf format
   (300 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (300 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w16106

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Klein, Moser, and Urban w15985 The Contribution of Trade to Wage Inequality: The Role of Skill, Gender, and Nationality
Harrison, McLaren, and McMillan w16425 Recent Findings on Trade and Inequality
Edwards and Lawrence w16105 Do Developed and Developing Countries Compete Head to Head in High-tech?
Amiti and Davis w14106 Trade, Firms, and Wages: Theory and Evidence
Mitchener and Yan w15679 Globalization, Trade & Wages: What Does History tell us about China?
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us