NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

What Happens in the Field Stays in the Field: Exploring Whether Professionals Play Minimax in Laboratory Experiments

Steven D. Levitt, John A. List, David H. Reiley, Jr.

NBER Working Paper No. 15609
Issued in December 2009
NBER Program(s):   IO   LS

The minimax argument represents game theory in its most elegant form: simple but with stark predictions. Although some of these predictions have been met with reasonable success in the field, experimental data have generally not provided results close to the theoretical predictions. In a striking study, Palacios-Huerta and Volij (2007) present evidence that potentially resolves this puzzle: both amateur and professional soccer players play nearly exact minimax strategies in laboratory experiments. In this paper, we establish important bounds on these results by examining the behavior of four distinct subject pools: college students, bridge professionals, world-class poker players, who have vast experience with high-stakes randomization in card games, and American professional soccer players. In contrast to Palacios-Huerta and Volij’s results, we find little evidence that real-world experience transfers to the lab in these games—indeed, similar to previous experimental results, all four subject pools provide choices that are generally not close to minimax predictions. We use two additional pieces of evidence to explore why professionals do not perform well in the lab: (1) complementary experimental treatments that pit professionals against preprogrammed computers, and (2) post-experiment questionnaires. The most likely explanation is that these professionals are unable to transfer their skills at randomization from the familiar context of the field to the unfamiliar context of the lab.

download in pdf format
   (85 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (85 K) or via email.

Acknowledgments

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w15609

Published: Steven D. Levitt & John A. List & David H. Reiley, 2010. "What Happens in the Field Stays in the Field: Exploring Whether Professionals Play Minimax in Laboratory Experiments," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1413-1434, 07.

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Levitt, List, and Sadoff w15610 Checkmate: Exploring Backward Induction Among Chess Players
Kovash and Levitt w15347 Professionals Do Not Play Minimax: Evidence from Major League Baseball and the National Football League
DellaVigna, List, and Malmendier w15629 Testing for Altruism and Social Pressure in Charitable Giving
Hossain and List w15623 The Behavioralist Visits the Factory: Increasing Productivity Using Simple Framing Manipulations
List, Sadoff, and Wagner w15701 So you want to run an experiment, now what? Some Simple Rules of Thumb for Optimal Experimental Design
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us