How Does Simplified Disclosure Affect Individuals' Mutual Fund Choices?
NBER Working Paper No. 14859
Issued in April 2009
NBER Program(s): AG AP PE
We use an experiment to estimate the effect of the SEC's Summary Prospectus, which simplifies mutual fund disclosure. Our subjects chose an equity portfolio and a bond portfolio. Subjects received either statutory prospectuses or Summary Prospectuses. We find no evidence that the Summary Prospectus affects portfolio choices. Our experiment sheds new light on the scope of investor confusion about sales loads. Even with a one-month investment horizon, subjects do not avoid loads. Subjects are either confused about loads, overlook them, or believe their chosen portfolio has an annualized log return that is 24 percentage points higher than the load-minimizing portfolio.
A non-technical summary of this paper is available in the July 2009 NBER digest.
You can sign up to receive the NBER Digest by email.
The NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health provides summaries of publications like this.
You can sign up to receive the NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health by email.
This paper is available as PDF (336 K) or via email.
This paper was revised on December 5, 2011
Machine-readable bibliographic record -
Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w14859
Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
|Myers, Poterba, and Shackelford
||w8653 Copycat Funds: Information Disclosure Regulation and the Returns to Active Management in the Mutual Fund Industry
|Choi, Laibson, and Madrian
||w12261 Why Does the Law of One Price Fail? An Experiment on Index Mutual Funds
|Beshears, Choi, Laibson, and Madrian
||The Impact of Employer Matching on Savings Plan Participation under Automatic Enrollment
|Del Guercio, Reuter, and Tkac
||w16312 Broker Incentives and Mutual Fund Market Segmentation
|Laibson and Mollerstrom
||w15759 Capital Flows, Consumption Booms and Asset Bubbles: A Behavioural Alternative to the Savings Glut Hypothesis