NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Profit Shifting and Trade Agreements in Imperfectly Competitive Markets

Kyle Bagwell, Robert W. Staiger

NBER Working Paper No. 14803
Issued in March 2009
NBER Program(s):   ITI

When markets are imperfectly competitive, trade policies can alter the terms of trade, shift profits from one country to another, and moderate or exacerbate existing distortions that are associated with the presence of monopoly power. In light of the various ways in which trade policies may influence welfare, it might be expected that new rationales for trade agreements would arise once imperfectly competitive markets are allowed. In this paper, we consider several trade models that feature imperfectly competitive markets and argue that the basic rationale for a trade agreement is, in fact, the same rationale that arises in perfectly competitive markets. In all of the models that we consider, and whether or not governments have political-economic objectives, the only rationale for a trade agreement is to remedy the inefficient terms-of-trade driven restrictions in trade volume. Having identified the problem that a trade agreement might solve, we next evaluate the form that an efficiency-enhancing trade agreement might take. Here, too, our results parallel the results established previously for models with perfectly competitive markets. In particular, we show that the principles of reciprocity and non-discrimination (MFN) are efficiency enhancing, as they serve to "undo" the terms-of-trade driven restrictions in trade volume that occur when governments pursue unilateral trade policies.

download in pdf format
   (348 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (348 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w14803

Published: Kyle Bagwell & Robert W. Staiger, 2012. "Profit Shifting And Trade Agreements In Imperfectly Competitive Markets," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 53(4), pages 1067-1104, November. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Bagwell and Staiger w15444 Delocation and Trade Agreements in Imperfectly Competitive Markets
AntrĂ s and Staiger w14285 Offshoring and the Role of Trade Agreements
Bagwell and Staiger w15492 The Economics of Trade Agreements in the Linear Cournot Delocation Model
Bagwell and Staiger w15445 The WTO: Theory and Practice
Donohue and Wolfers w11982 Uses and Abuses of Empirical Evidence in the Death Penalty Debate
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us