NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

New Keynesian versus Old Keynesian Government Spending Multipliers

John F. Cogan, Tobias Cwik, John B. Taylor, Volker Wieland

NBER Working Paper No. 14782
Issued in March 2009
NBER Program(s):   EFG

Renewed interest in fiscal policy has increased the use of quantitative models to evaluate policy. Because of modelling uncertainty, it is essential that policy evaluations be robust to alternative assumptions. We find that models currently being used in practice to evaluate fiscal policy stimulus proposals are not robust. Government spending multipliers in an alternative empirically-estimated and widely-cited new Keynesian model are much smaller than in these old Keynesian models; the estimated stimulus is extremely small just when needed most, and GDP and employment effects are only one-sixth as large, with private sector employment impacts likely to be even smaller.

download in pdf format
   (83 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (83 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w14782

Published: Cogan, John F. & Cwik, Tobias & Taylor, John B. & Wieland, Volker, 2010. "New Keynesian versus old Keynesian government spending multipliers," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 281-295, March. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Christiano, Eichenbaum, and Rebelo w15394 When is the government spending multiplier large?
Barro and Redlick w15369 Macroeconomic Effects from Government Purchases and Taxes
Reinhart and Rogoff w15639 Growth in a Time of Debt
Ilzetzki, Mendoza, and Vegh w16479 How Big (Small?) are Fiscal Multipliers?
Benigno w14824 New-Keynesian Economics: An AS-AD View
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us