NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Public or Private Production of Food Safety: What Do U.S. Consumers Want?

V. Kerry Smith, Carol Mansfield, Aaron Strong

NBER Working Paper No. 14287
Issued in August 2008
NBER Program(s):   EEE

This paper reports estimates of consumers' preferences for plans to improve food safety. The plans are distinguished based on whether they address the ex ante risk of food borne illness or the ex post effects of the illness. They are also distinguished based on whether they focus on a public good -- reducing risk of illness for all consumers or allowing individual households to reduce their private risks of contracting a food borne pathogen. Based on a National Survey conducted in 2007 using the Knowledge Network internet panel our findings indicate consumers favor ex ante risk reductions and are willing to pay approximately $250 annually to reduce the risk of food borne illness. Moreover, they prefer private to public approaches and would not support efforts to reduce the severity of cases of illness over risk reductions.

download in pdf format
   (380 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (380 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w14287

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Schmidt, Shore-Sheppard, and Watson w19558 The Effect of Safety Net Programs on Food Insecurity
Strong and Smith w14304 Reconsidering the Economics of Demand Analysis with Kinked Budget Constraints
Lu and Goldman w15720 The Effects of Relative Food Prices on Obesity — Evidence from China: 1991-2006
Borjas w9236 Food Insecurity and Public Assistance
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us