TY - JOUR AU - Burkhauser,Richard V. AU - Feng,Shuaizhang AU - Jenkins,Stephen P. AU - Larrimore,Jeff TI - Estimating Trends in US Income Inequality Using the Current Population Survey: The Importance of Controlling for Censoring JF - National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series VL - No. 14247 PY - 2008 Y2 - August 2008 UR - http://www.nber.org/papers/w14247 L1 - http://www.nber.org/papers/w14247.pdf N1 - Author contact info: Richard V. Burkhauser Cornell University Department of Policy Analysis & Management 259 MVR Hall Ithaca, NY 14853-4401 Tel: 607/255-2097 Fax: 607/255-4071 E-Mail: rvb1@cornell.edu Shuaizhang Feng Department of Economics Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Shanghai China E-Mail: shuaizhang.feng@gmail.com Stephen Jenkins University of Essex Institute for Social and Economic Research Colchester, ENGLAND CO4 3SQ E-Mail: stephenj@essex.ac.uk Jeff Larrimore Joint Committee on Taxation 1625 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 E-Mail: jeff.larrimore@mail.house.gov AB - Using internal and public use March Current Population Survey (CPS) data, we analyze trends in US income inequality (1975-2004). We find that the upward trend in income inequality prior to 1993 significantly slowed thereafter once we control for top coding in the public use data and censoring in the internal data. Because both series do not capture trends at the very top of the income distribution, we use a multiple imputation approach in which values for censored observations are imputed using draws from a Generalized Beta distribution of the Second Kind (GB2) fitted to internal data. Doing so, we find income inequality trends similar to those derived from unadjusted internal data. Our trend results are generally robust to the choice of inequality index, whether Gini coefficient or other commonly-used indices. When we compare our best estimates of the income shares held by the richest tenth with those reported by Piketty and Saez (2003), our trends fairly closely match their trends, except for the top 1 percent of the distribution. Thus, we argue that if United States income inequality has been substantially increasing since 1993, such increases are confined to this very high income group. ER -