NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Economics and Ideology: Causal Evidence of the Impact of Economic Conditions on Support for Redistribution and Other Ballot Proposals

Eric J. Brunner, Stephen L. Ross, Ebonya L. Washington

NBER Working Paper No. 14091
Issued in June 2008
NBER Program(s):   POL

Using California ballot proposition returns and exogenous shifts to labor demand, we provide the first large-scale causal evidence of the impact of economic conditions on policy preferences. Consistent with economic theory, we find that positive economic shocks decrease support for redistributive policies. More notably, we find evidence of a need for cognitive consistency in voting behavior as economic shocks have a smaller significant impact on voting on non-economic ballot issues. While we also demonstrate that positive shocks decrease turnout, we present evidence that our results reflect changes to the electorate’s preferences and not simply to its composition.

download in pdf format
   (242 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (242 K) or via email.

Acknowledgments

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w14091

Published: “Economics and Policy Preferences: Causal Evidence of the Impact of Economic Conditions on Support for Redistribution and Other Proposals,” Review of Economics and Statistics (2011), 93(3): 888-906 (with Eric Brunner and Stephen L. Ross)

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Benabou w13907 Ideology
Alesina, Cozzi, and Mantovan w15587 The Evolution of Ideology, Fairness and Redistribution
DeSimone and LaFountain w13549 Still the Economy, Stupid: Economic Voting in the 2004 Presidential Election
Luttmer and Singhal w14268 Culture, Context, and the Taste for Redistribution
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us