Monopoly and the Incentive to Innovate When Adoption Involves Switchover Disruptions

Thomas J. Holmes, David K. Levine, James A. Schmitz, Jr.

NBER Working Paper No. 13864
Issued in March 2008
NBER Program(s):Productivity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship

When considering the incentive of a monopolist to adopt an innovation, the textbook model assumes that it can instantaneously and seamlessly introduce the new technology. In fact, firms often face major problems in integrating new technologies. In some cases, firms have to (temporarily) produce at levels substantially below capacity upon adoption. We call such phenomena switchover disruptions, and present extensive evidence on them. If firms face switchover disruptions, then they may temporarily lose some unit sales upon adoption. If the firm loses unit sales, then a cost of adoption is the foregone rents on the sales of those units. Hence, greater market power will mean higher prices on those lost units of output, and hence a reduced incentive to innovate. We introduce switchover disruptions into some standard models in the literature, show they can overturn some famous results, and then show they can help explain evidence that firms in more competitive environments are more likely to adopt technologies and increase productivity.

download in pdf format
   (426 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w13864

Published: Holmes, Thomas J., David K. Levine, and James A. Schmitz. 2012. "Monopoly and the Incentive to Innovate When Adoption Involves Switchover Disruptions." American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 4(3): 1-33. DOI: 10.1257/mic.4.3.1 citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Darby and Zucker w12094 Innovation, Competition and Welfare-Enhancing Monopoly
Gilbert Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where Are We in the Competition-Innovation Debate?
Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention
Aghion, Bloom, Blundell, Griffith, and Howitt w9269 Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship
Evans and Schmalensee w8268 Some Economic Aspects of Antitrust Analysis in Dynamically Competitive Industries
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us