TY - JOUR AU - Mitchener,Kris James AU - Weidenmier,Marc TI - Trade and Empire JF - National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series VL - No. 13765 PY - 2008 Y2 - January 2008 UR - http://www.nber.org/papers/w13765 L1 - http://www.nber.org/papers/w13765.pdf N1 - Author contact info: Kris James Mitchener Department of Economics Leavey School of Business Santa Clara University Santa Clara, CA 95053 Tel: 408/554-4340 Fax: 408/554-2331 E-Mail: kmitchener@scu.edu Marc D. Weidenmier Robert Day School of Economics and Finance Claremont McKenna College 500 East Ninth Street Claremont, CA 91711 Tel: 909/607-8497 Fax: 909/621-8249 E-Mail: marc_weidenmier@claremontmckenna.edu AB - Although many modern studies find large and significant effects of prior colonial status on bilateral trade, there is very little empirical research that has focused on the contemporaneous impact of empire on trade. We employ a new database of over 21,000 bilateral trade observations during the Age of High Imperialism, 1870-1913, to quantitatively assess the effect of empire on trade. Our augmented gravity model shows that belonging to an empire roughly doubled trade relative to those countries that were not part of an empire. The positive impact that empire exerts on trade does not appear to be sensitive to whether the metropole was Britain, France, Germany, Spain, or the United States or to the inclusion of other institutional factors such as being on the gold standard. In addition, we examine some of the channels through which colonial status impacted bilateral trade flows. The empirical analysis suggests that empires increased trade by lowering transactions costs and by establishing trade policies that promoted trade within empires. In particular, the use of a common language, the establishment of currency unions, the monetizing of recently acquired colonies, preferential trade arrangements, and customs unions help to account for the observed increase in trade associated with empire. ER -