TY  - JOUR
AU  - Antràs,Pol
AU  - Caballero,Ricardo J.
TI  - Trade and Capital Flows: A Financial Frictions Perspective
JF  - National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series
VL  - No. 13241
PY  - 2007
Y2  - July 2007
UR  - http://www.nber.org/papers/w13241
L1  - http://www.nber.org/papers/w13241.pdf
N1  - Author contact info:
Pol Antràs
Department of Economics
Harvard University
1805 Cambridge Street
Littauer Center 207
Cambridge, MA 02138
Tel: 617/495-1236
Fax: 617/495-8570
E-Mail: pantras@fas.harvard.edu

Ricardo J. Caballero
MIT
Department of Economics
Room E52-373a
Cambridge, MA 02142-1347
Tel: 617/253-0489
Fax: 617/253-6915
E-Mail: caball@mit.edu
AB  - The classical Heckscher-Ohlin-Mundell paradigm states that trade and capital mobility are substitutes, in the sense that trade integration reduces the incentives for capital to flow to capital-scarce countries. In this paper we show that in a world with heterogeneous financial development, the classic conclusion does not hold. In particular, in less financially developed economies (South), trade and capital mobility are complements. Within a dynamic framework, the complementarity carries over to (financial) capital flows. This interaction implies that deepening trade integration in South raises net capital inflows (or reduces net capital outflows). It also implies that, at the global level, protectionism may backfire if the goal is to rebalance capital flows, when these are already heading from South to North. Our perspective also has implications for the effects of trade integration on factor prices. In contrast to the Heckscher-Ohlin model, trade liberalization always decreases the wage-rental in South: an anti-Stolper-Samuelson result.
ER  -