NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Overruling and the Instability of Law

Nicola Gennaioli, Andrei Shleifer

NBER Working Paper No. 12913
Issued in February 2007
NBER Program(s):   LE

We investigate the evolution of common law under overruling, a system of precedent change in which appellate courts replace existing legal rules with new ones. We use a legal realist model, in which judges change the law to reflect their own preferences or attitudes, but changing the law is costly to them. The model's predictions are consistent with the empirical evidence on the overruling behavior of the U.S. Supreme Court and appellate courts. We find that overruling leads to unstable legal rules that rarely converge to efficiency. The selection of disputes for litigation does not change this conclusion. Our findings provide a rationale for the value of precedent, as well as for the general preference of appellate courts for distinguishing rather than overruling as a law-making strategy.

download in pdf format
   (163 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (163 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w12913

Published: Gennaioli, Nicola & Shleifer, Andrei, 2007. "Overruling and the instability of law," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 309-328, June. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Gennaioli and Shleifer w11265 The Evolution of Precedent
Gennaioli and Shleifer w12679 Judicial Fact Discretion
Niblett, Posner, and Shleifer w13856 The Evolution of a Legal Rule
La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, and Shleifer w13608 The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins
Landes and Posner w0146 Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us