This paper examines the welfare consequences of social safety nets in developing economies relative to developed economies. Using panel surveys of households in Indonesia and the United States, we find that food consumption falls by approximately ten percent when individuals become unemployed in both countries. This finding suggests that introducing a formal social insurance program would have small benefits in terms of reducing consumption fluctuations in Indonesia. However, in contrast with households in the U.S., Indonesians use costly methods such as reducing human capital investment to smooth consumption. The primary benefit of social insurance in developing countries may therefore come not from consumption smoothing itself but from reducing the use of inefficient
smoothing methods.
*Published: This paper was subsequently published as Income Risk and the Benefits of Social Insurance: Evidence from Indonesia and the United States, Raj Chetty, Adam Looney, in NBER book Fiscal Policy and Management in East Asia, NBER-EASE, Volume 16 (2007)
You may purchase this paper on-line in .pdf format
from SSRN.com ($5) for electronic delivery.
This paper was revised on September 6, 2006
Machine-readable bibliographic record -
MARC,
RIS,
BibTeX
