Measures of Per Capita Hours and their Implications for the Technology-Hours Debate

Neville Francis, Valerie A. Ramey

NBER Working Paper No. 11694
Issued in October 2005
NBER Program(s):   EFG   LS

Structural vector autoregressions give conflicting results on the effects of technology shocks on hours. The results depend crucially on the assumed data generating process for hours per capita. We show that the standard measure of hours per capita has significant low frequency movements that are the source of the conflicting results. HP filtered hours per capita produce results consistent with the those obtained when hours are assumed to have a unit root. We provide an alternative measure of hours per capita that adjusts for low frequency movements in government employment, schooling, and the aging of the population. When the new measure is used to determine the effect of technology shocks on hours using long-run restrictions, both the levels and the difference specifications give the same answer: hours decline in the short-run in response to a positive technology shock.

download in pdf format
   (214 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (214 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w11694

Published: Neville Francis & Valerie A. Ramey, 2009. "Measures of per Capita Hours and Their Implications for the Technology-Hours Debate," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(6), pages 1071-1097, 09. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Gali and Rabanal Technology Shocks and Aggregate Fluctuations: How Well Does the Real Business Cycle Model Fit Postwar U.S. Data?
Christiano, Eichenbaum, and Vigfusson w9819 What Happens After a Technology Shock?
Francis and Ramey w10631 The Source of Historical Economic Fluctuations: An Analysis using Long-Run Restrictions
Gali w5721 Technology, Employment, and the Business Cycle: Do Technology Shocks Explain Aggregate Fluctuations
Francis and Ramey w8726 Is the Technology-Driven Real Business Cycle Hypothesis Dead?
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us