NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Re-Assessing the Revisionists

David H. Autor, Lawrence F. Katz, Melissa S. Kearney

NBER Working Paper No. 11627
Issued in September 2005
NBER Program(s):   ED   EFG   LS

A recent "revisionist " literature characterizes the pronounced rise in U.S. wage inequality since 1980 as an "episodic " event of the first-half of the 1980s driven by non-market factors (particularly a falling real minimum wage) and concludes that continued increases in wage inequality since the late 1980s substantially reflect the mechanical confounding effects of changes in labor force composition. Analyzing data from the Current Population Survey for 1963 to 2005, we find limited support for these claims. The slowing of the growth of overall wage inequality in the 1990s hides a divergence in the paths of upper-tail (90/50) inequality -- which has increased steadily since 1980, even adjusting for changes in labor force composition -- and lower tail (50/10) inequality, which rose sharply in the first-half of the 1980s and plateaued or contracted thereafter. Fluctuations in the real minimum wage are not a plausible explanation for these trends since the bulk of inequality growth occurs above the median of the wage distribution. Models emphasizing rapid secular growth in the relative demand for skills -- attributable to skill-biased technical change -- and a sharp deceleration in the relative supply of college workers in the 1980s do an excellent job of capturing the evolution of the college/high-school wage premium over four decades. But these models also imply a puzzling deceleration in relative demand growth for college workers in the early 1990s, also visible in a recent "polarization" of skill demands in which employment has expanded in high-wage and low-wage work at the expense of middle-wage jobs. These patterns are potentially reconciled by a modified version of the skill-biased technical change hypothesis that emphasizes the role of information technology in complementing abstract (high-education) tasks and substituting for routine (middle-education) tasks.

download in pdf format
   (514 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (514 K) or via email.

This paper was revised on June 18, 2007

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w11627

Published: Autor, David H., Lawrence F. Katz and Melissa Schettini Kearney. “Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Re-Assessing the Revisionists.” Review of Economics and Statistics 90, 2 (May 2008) 300 – 323.

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Card and DiNardo w8769 Skill Biased Technological Change and Rising Wage Inequality: Some Problems and Puzzles
Autor, Katz, and Kearney w11986 The Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market
Autor, Katz, and Kearney w11628 Rising Wage Inequality: The Role of Composition and Prices
Goldin and Katz w13568 Long-Run Changes in the U.S. Wage Structure: Narrowing, Widening, Polarizing
Berman, Bound, and Machin w6166 Implications of Skill-Biased Technological Change: International Evidence
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us