While neoclassical models assume static cost-minimization by firms, agency models suggest that firms may not minimize costs in less-competitive or regulated environments. We test this using a transition from cost-of-service regulation to market-oriented environments for many U.S. electric generating plants. Our estimates of input demand suggest that publicly-owned plants, whose owners were largely insulated from these reforms, experienced the smallest efficiency gains, while investor-owned plants in states that restructured their wholesale electricity markets improved the most. The results suggest modest medium-term efficiency benefits from replacing regulated monopoly with a market-based industry structure.
Published: Fabrizio, Kira, Nancy Rose and Catherine Wolfram. "Do Markets Reduce Costs? Assessing the Impact of Regulatory Restructuring on U.S. Electric Generation Efficiency.” American Economic Review 97 (September 2007): 1250-1277.
This paper is available as PDF (243 K) or via email.
An online appendix is available for this publication.
This paper was revised on June 28, 2007
Acknowledgments
Machine-readable bibliographic record -
MARC,
RIS,
BibTeX
