Does Anticipated Aggregate Demand Policy Matter? Further Econometric results.
NBER Working Paper No. 789 (Also Reprint No. r0338)
A heated debate has arisen over what Modigliani has dubbed the Macro Rational Expections (MRE) hypothesis. This hypothesis embodies two component hypotheses: 1) rational expectations and 2) short-run neutrality -- i.e., that anticipated changes in aggregate demand will have already been taken into account in economic agents' behavior and will thus evoke no output or employment response. Together these component hypotheses imply that deterministic feedback policy rules will have no effect on business cycle fluctuations. The irrelevance of these types of policy rules is inconsistent with much previous macro theorizing as well as with the views of policymakers. It is thus an extremely controversial proposition which requires a wide range of empirical research. This paper is a sequel to a previous paper by the author. That paper developed a methodology for testing the MRE hypothesis and found that anticipated money growth does matter to the business cycle. This paper extends the analyses to cases where the rate of nominal GNP growth or the inflation rate, rather than money growth, is the aggregate demand variable. The empirical results are also negative on the MRE hypothesis and its corresponding policy ineffectiveness proposition.
Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w0789
Published: Mishkin, Frederic S. "Does Anticipated Aggregate Demand Policy Matter? Further Econometric Results." The American Economic Review, Vol. 72, No. 4 (September 1982), pp. 788-802. citation courtesy of