Process Consistency and Monetary Reform: Further Evidence and Implications
 (400 K)
|
NBER Working Paper No. 635
Issued in February 1981
NBER Program(s): EFG
In this paper we provide additional evidence that process consistency may have materialized as a restrictive constraint on the money generation process. In addition to recomputing the time series of process consistency probabilities using new data from the German case, we also supply our empirical technique to the data from the other hyperinflations studied by Cagan. We interpret our results as evidence hearing on the type of transversality condition studied by Brock or by Brock and Scheinkman as a sufficient condition to insure a unique equilibrium in optimizing models with perfect foresight and money.
Published: Flood, Robert P. and Peter M. Garber. "Process Consistency and Monetary Reform: Some Further Evidence." Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 12, No. 2,(August 1983), pp. 279-296.
This paper is available as PDF (400 K) or via email.
Machine-readable bibliographic record -
MARC,
RIS,
BibTeX
|
|
|
About
Support
The research activities of the NBER are funded by grants from federal research agencies, by private foundations, and by generous donations from our corporate associates and from private individuals. The NBER is a non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization. For information on supporting the NBER, please contact:
Mr. Denis Healy, Director of Development
NBER
1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138-5398
ph: 617-868-3900
email: dhealy@nber.org
Close