The Relative Importance of Permanent and Transitory Components: Identi- fication and Some Theoretical Bounds
NBER Technical Working Paper No. 106
Much macroeconometric discussion has recently emphasized the economic significance of the size of the permanent component in GNP. Consequently, a large literature has developed that tries to estimate this magnitude measured, essentially, as the spectral density of increments in GNP at frequency zero. This paper shows that unless the permanent component is a random walk this attention has been misplaced: in general, that quantity does not identify the magnitude of the permanent component. Further, by developing bounds on reasonable measures of this magnitude, the paper shows that a random walk specification is biased towards establishing the permanent component as important.
Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/t0106
Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these: