NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

The Paradox of Planning: The Controlled Materials Plan of World War II

John Landon-Lane, Hugh Rockoff

NBER Historical Working Paper No. 83
Issued in May 1996
NBER Program(s):   DAE

According to most standard accounts of the mobilization of the U.S. economy in World War II, things started out badly because the agency nominally in charge, the War Production Board, lacked sufficient authority and relied on faulty techniques. But then the War Production Board installed the famous Controlled Materials Plan, a form of central planning, which solved the major problems and turned disaster into triumph. Here we re-examine the Plan and argue that it was too little and too late to account for the success of the mobilization. As an alternative we argue that the delay in the flow of munitions may simply have been the inevitable result of time-to-build and that a good deal of coordination happened through the market. The appropriate historical analogy may not be form of European central planning, but rather the American gold rush of 1849.

download in pdf format
   (1015 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (1015 K) or via email.

This paper was revised on July 29, 2013

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/h0083

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Gordon w14560 Did Economics Cause World War II?
Rockoff h0077 From Plowshares to Swords: The American Economy in World War II
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us