Age-Friendly Jobs on the Rise, and Not Just for Older Workers

11/01/2022
Featured in print Digest

The figure is a bar chart titled, "Age-Friendliness of Jobs by Industry."  The y-axis, which ranges from 0.2 to 0.32, plots the average 2020 age-friendliness index by sector.   The following lists the industries from the least to most job-friendly: construction, agricultural, manufacturing, personal services, mining, business and repair services, public administration, transportation, entertainment and recreational services, wholesale, professional and related services, retail, and finance/insurance/real estate.   Source: Researchers’ calculations using data from the O*NET database and other sources

As the US population grows older, supporting employment at older ages can be an important contributor to economic growth. In The Rise of Age-Friendly Jobs (NBER Working Paper 30463), Daron Acemoglu, Nicolaj Søndergaard Mühlbach, and Andrew J. Scott build an index to assess whether occupations in the US economy have become more accommodating to older workers. Their resulting Age-Friendliness Index (AFI), aggregated across all jobs, increased by 8 percent between 1990 and 2020.

The AFI is created in four steps. First, the researchers use the US Department of Labor’s O*NET descriptions of 244 job attributes for each of 873 occupations. Second, they rely on past research on the preferences of older workers to establish weights for these attributes. This involved nine categories: schedule flexibility, telecommuting, physical job demands, pace of work, autonomy at work, paid time off, working in teams, job training, and meaningful work. Absence of physical work, paid time off, and schedule flexibility received the largest weights. Third, they use relative weights reflecting the extent to which older workers’ preferences differed from those of younger workers. The fourth step, enabled by machine learning algorithms, correlates 17,000 descriptors for each O*NET occupation with these nine components of age friendliness and builds an overall index using the absolute and relative weights.

Age-friendly jobs offer less physical exertion, greater use of social skills, and less harsh environmental conditions.

The 10 most age-friendly occupations in 2020 were guides, receptionists, ticket agents, secretaries, human resources managers, proofreaders, insurance salespeople, insurance adjusters, business promotion agents, and vocational and educational counselors. The 10 least age-friendly occupations were concrete and cement workers, carpenters, painters, masons, tool and die makers, library technicians, chemists, furniture and wood finishers, mixing and blending machine operators, and construction laborers.

Ninety-two percent of the increase in the AFI index over the last three decades was due to changes within occupations; the balance was the result of a shifting mix of occupations in the US economy. Employment in above average age-friendly occupations increased by about 44 percent, compared to an increase of 21 percent for below average age-friendly occupations.

Overall, employment in above average age-friendly occupations rose by 49 million workers. Given that the AFI is positively correlated with the share of older workers, these changes appear to favor creation of new, more accommodating jobs for older workers. Indeed, employment of those aged 50 years and above accounts for 28 million of the 42 million worker increase in US employment between 1990 and 2020.

However, closer examination shows that older workers were not the main beneficiaries of the increase in age-friendly jobs. While older female and college-graduate workers have moved into more age-friendly jobs since 1990, so have women and college graduates of all ages. Men without a college degree have not done so, however. A key explanation for this finding is the large number of these men working in manufacturing and construction, industries with relatively few age-friendly jobs and which have seen the least improvement in their age friendliness. A related reason for this pattern may be that characteristics that make jobs friendly to older workers also make them attractive to women and college graduates, who may have been able to outcompete older nongraduate men for these jobs.

These results suggest that while the creation of age-friendly occupations is supportive of employment at older ages, relying on the creation of new age-friendly jobs may not be sufficient for boosting employment of older workers.

— Linda Gorman