AGOA Rules: The Intended and Unintended Consequences of Special Fabric Provisions

Lawrence Edwards, Robert Lawrence

This chapter is a preliminary draft unless otherwise noted. It may not have been subjected to the formal review process of the NBER. This page will be updated as the chapter is revised.

Chapter in forthcoming NBER book African Successes: Modernization and Development, Volume 3, Sebastian Edwards, Simon Johnson, and David N. Weil, editors
Forthcoming from University of Chicago Press
in African Successes Project

Lesotho and other least developed African countries responded impressively to the preferences they were granted under the African Growth and Opportunities Act with a rapid increase in their clothing exports to the US. But this performance has not been accompanied by some of the more dynamic growth benefits that might have been hoped for. In this study we develop the theory and present empirical evidence to demonstrate that these outcomes are the predictable consequences of the manner in which the specific preferences might be expected to work.

The MFA (Multi-fiber Arrangement) quotas on US imports of textiles created a favorable environment for low value-added, fabric-intensive clothing production in countries with unused quotas by inducing constrained countries to move into higher quality products. By allowing the least developed African countries to use third country fabrics in their clothing exports to the US, AGOA provided additional implicit effective subsidies to clothing that were multiples of the US tariffs on clothing imports. Taken together, these policies help account for the program's success and demonstrate the importance of other rules of origin in preventing poor countries from taking advantage of other preference programs.

But the disappointments can also be attributed to the preferences because they discouraged additional value-addition in assembly and stimulated the use of expensive fabrics that were unlikely to be produced locally. When the MFA was removed, constrained countries such as China moved strongly into precisely the markets in which AGOA countries had specialized. Although AGOA helped the least developed countries withstand this shock, they were nonetheless adversely affected. Preference erosion due to MFN reductions in US clothing tariffs could similarly have particularly severe adverse effects on these countries.

download in pdf format
   (548 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (548 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

This chapter first appeared as NBER working paper w16623, AGOA Rules: The Intended and Unintended Consequences of Special Fabric Provisions, Lawrence Edwards, Robert Z. Lawrence
Users who downloaded this chapter also downloaded these:
Frankel Mauritius: African Success Story
Edwards and Lawrence w16623 AGOA Rules: The Intended and Unintended Consequences of Special Fabric Provisions
Bhattacharya, Gathmann, and Miller w18589 The Gorbachev Anti-Alcohol Campaign and Russia's Mortality Crisis
Davies, Xiaojun, and Whalley w16878 The Possibilities For Global Poverty Reduction Using Revenues From Global Carbon Pricing
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us