NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Did the Fiscal Stimulus Work for Universities?

Michael F. Dinerstein, Caroline M. Hoxby, Jonathan Meer, Pablo Villanueva


This chapter is a preliminary draft unless otherwise noted. It may not have been subjected to the formal review process of the NBER. This page will be updated as the chapter is revised.

Chapter in forthcoming NBER book How the Financial Crisis and Great Recession Affected Higher Education, Jeffrey Brown and Caroline Hoxby, editors
Conference held September 27-28, 2012
Forthcoming from University of Chicago Press

We investigate how stimulus-motivated federal funding directed to universities affected their revenues, expenditures, employment, tuition, student aid, endowment spending, and receipt of state government appropriations. We also investigate how these funds affected the economies of the counties in which the institutions are located. To overcome the potential endogeneity of federal funds (for instance, federal student aid rising when students become poorer), we employ: (i) an instrument that applies nation-wide rates of increase in research funding by agency to universities whose initial dependence on these agencies differs; and (ii) an instrument that applies the change in the maximum Pell Grant to institutions with varying initial numbers of students eligible for the maximum grant. Our results suggest that federal funds induced private universities to increase research, reduce tuition, raise student aid, spend slightly more on many categories of expenditure, and slightly reduce endowment spending rates. These results are consistent with private universities maximizing objectives that require them to allocate funds over a broad array of activities. Our results suggest that public universities used federal funds as leverage to gain independence from state governments--gaining the ability to set tuition closer to market-based rates but losing state appropriations in the bargain. We find no evidence that federal funds directed to universities propped up aggregate demand or generated local economic multipliers in the classic Keynesian sense, but this is not surprising because only a small share of the federal funds "stuck where they hit."

download in pdf format
   (9192 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (9192 K) or via email.

This paper was revised on January 23, 2014

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Users who downloaded this chapter also downloaded these:
Brown and Hoxby Introduction to "How the Great Recession Affected Higher Education"
Bettinger and Williams Federal and State Financial Aid During the Great Recession
Brown, Dimmock, and Weisbenner The Supply of and Demand for Charitable Donations to Higher Education
Long The Financial Crisis and College Enrollment: How Have Students and Their Families Responded?
Hoxby and Avery w18586 The Missing "One-Offs": The Hidden Supply of High-Achieving, Low Income Students
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us