NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

The "Austerity Myth": Gain without Pain?

Roberto Perotti

Chapter in NBER book Fiscal Policy after the Financial Crisis (2013), Alberto Alesina and Francesco Giavazzi, editors (p. 307 - 354)
Conference held December 12-13, 2011
Published in June 2013 by University of Chicago Press
© 2013 by the National Bureau of Economic Research

This chapter examines four case studies of large fiscal consolidations. Two of these episodes--Denmark 1982 to 1986 and Ireland 1987 to 1990--were exchange-rate-based consolidations; the other two--Finland 1992 to 1998 and Sweden 1993 to 1998--were undertaken in the opposite circumstances, after abandoning a peg. The analysis addresses two main questions. First, is there evidence that large budget consolidations, particularly those which are based mainly on spending cuts, have expansionary effects in the short run? Second, if the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, how useful is the experience of the past as a guide to the present?

download in pdf format
   (939 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (939 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

This chapter first appeared as NBER working paper w17571, The "Austerity Myth": Gain Without Pain?, Roberto Perotti
Commentary on this chapter: Comment, Philip R. Lane
Users who downloaded this chapter also downloaded these:
Trabandt and Uhlig How Do Laffer Curves Differ across Countries?
Lane Comment on "The "Austerity Myth": Gain Without Pain?"
Alesina and Ardagna w15438 Large Changes in Fiscal Policy: Taxes Versus Spending
Alesina, Carloni, and Lecce The Electoral Consequences of Large Fiscal Adjustments
Wyplosz Fiscal Rules: Theoretical Issues and Historical Experiences
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us