Center for Labor Market Studies,
Higher School of Economics,
Information about this author at RePEc
NBER Working Papers and Publications
|May 2015||Misperceiving Inequality|
with Daniel Treisman: w21174
A vast literature suggests that economic inequality has important consequences for politics and public policy. Higher inequality is thought to increase demand for income redistribution in democracies and to discourage democratization and promote class conflict and revolution in dictatorships. Most such arguments crucially assume that ordinary people know how high inequality is, how it has been changing, and where they fit in the income distribution. Using a variety of large, cross-national surveys, we show that, in recent years, ordinary people have had little idea about such things. What they think they know is often wrong. Widespread ignorance and misperceptions emerge robustly, regardless of data source, operationalization, and measurement method. Moreover, perceived inequality—not the ...
Published: Vladimir Gimpelson & Daniel Treisman, 2018. "Misperceiving inequality," Economics & Politics, vol 30(1), pages 27-54. citation courtesy of