Department of Economics
W.P. Carey School of Business
Arizona State University
P.O. Box 873806
Tempe, AZ 85287
Tel: (864) 650-2500
Information about this author at RePEc
NBER Working Papers and Publications
|January 2016||Life-Cycle Human Capital Accumulation Across Countries: Lessons From U.S. Immigrants|
with David Lagakos, Benjamin Moll, Tommaso Porzio, Nancy Qian: w21914
How much does life-cycle human capital accumulation vary across countries? This paper seeks to answer this question by studying U.S. immigrants, who come from a wide variety of countries but work in a common labor market. We document that returns to potential experience among U.S. immigrants are higher on average for workers coming from rich countries than for those coming from poor countries. To understand this fact we build a model of life-cycle human capital accumulation that features three potential theories, working respectively through cross-country differences in: selection, skill loss, and human capital accumulation. To distinguish between theories, we use new data on the characteristics of immigrants and non-migrants from a large set of countries. We conclude that the most likely ...
|December 2012||Experience Matters: Human Capital and Development Accounting|
with David Lagakos, Benjamin Moll, Tommaso Porzio, Nancy Qian: w18602
We use international household-survey data to document that experience-wage profiles are flatter in poorer countries than in richer countries. We find a quantitatively similar pattern when we estimate returns to foreign experience by country of origin among U.S. immigrants. The most likely explanation for both findings is that workers accumulate less human capital from experience in poorer countries. Taking this into consideration in development accounting substantially increases the role of human capital in accounting for cross-country income differences.
|November 2009||Families as Roommates: Changes in U.S. Household Size from 1850 to 2000|
with Alejandrina Salcedo, Michèle Tertilt: w15477
Living arrangements have changed enormously over the last two centuries. While the average American today lives in a household of only three people, in 1850 household size was twice that figure. Further, both the number of children and the number of adults in a household have fallen dramatically. We develop a simple theory of household size where living with others is beneficial solely because the costs of household public goods can be shared. In other words, we abstract from intra-family relations and focus on households as collections of roommates. The model's mechanism is that rising income leads to a falling expenditure share on household public goods, which endogenously makes household formation less beneficial and privacy more attractive. To assess the magnitude of this mechanism, we...
Published: Alejandrina Salcedo & Todd Schoellman & Michèle Tertilt, 2012. "Families as roommates: Changes in U.S. household size from 1850 to 2000," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 3(1), pages 133-175, 03. citation courtesy of