Louisiana State University
Department of Economics, 2322
Business Education Complex,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Information about this author at RePEc
NBER Working Papers and Publications
|November 2016||The Aggregate Implications of Gender and Marriage|
with Margherita Borella, Mariacristina De Nardi: w22817
Wages, labor market participation, hours worked, and savings differ by gender and marital status. In addition, women and married people make up for a large fraction of the population and of labor market participants, total hours worked, and total earnings. For the most part, macroeconomists have been ignoring women and marriage in setting up structural models and by calibrating them using data on males only. In this paper we ask whether ignoring gender and marriage in both models and data implies that the resulting calibration matches well the key economic aggregates. We find that it does not and we ask whether there are other calibration strategies or relatively simple models of marriage that can improve the fit of the model to aggregate data.
Published: Margherita Borella & Mariacristina De Nardi & Fang Yang, 2017. "The aggregate implications of gender and marriage," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, .
|November 2015||Piketty's Book and Macro Models of Wealth Inequality|
with Mariacristina De Nardi, Giulio Fella: w21730
Piketty's book, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, discusses several factors affecting wealth inequality: rates of return on capital, output growth rates, tax progressivity, top income shares, and heterogeneity in saving rates and inheritances. This paper studies the role of various forces affecting savings in quantitative models of wealth inequality, discusses their successes and failures in accounting for the observed facts, and compares these model's implications with Piketty's conclusions.
Published: De Nardi, Mariacristina & Giulio , Fella & Yang, Fang, 2016. "Piketty’s Book and Macro Models of Wealth Inequality," Chicago Fed Letter, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. citation courtesy of
|March 2015||Wealth Inequality, Family Background, and Estate Taxation|
with Mariacristina De Nardi: w21047
This paper generates two main contributions. First, it provides a new theory of wealth inequality that merges two empirically relevant forces generating inequality: bequest motives and inheritance of ability across generations; and an earnings process that allows for more earnings risk for the richest. Second, it uses the resulting calibrated framework to study the effects of changing estate taxation. Increasing the estate tax reduces the wealth concentration in the hands of the richest few and the economic advantage of being born to a rich and super-rich family, at the cost of reduced aggregate capital and output. However, all of these effects are quite small. In contrast, increasing estate taxation can generate a significant welfare gain to a newborn under the veil of ignorance, but this...
Published: Mariacristina De Nardi & Fang Yang, 2016. "Wealth inequality, family background, and estate taxation," Journal of Monetary Economics, vol 77, pages 130-145. citation courtesy of
|April 2014||Bequests and Heterogeneity in Retirement Wealth|
with Mariacristina De Nardi: w20058
Households hold vastly heterogenous amounts of wealth when they reach retirement, and differences in lifetime earnings explain only part of this variation. This paper studies the role of intergenerational transmission of ability, voluntary bequest motives, and the recipiency of accidental and intended bequests (both in terms of timing and size), in generating wealth dispersion at retirement, in the context of a rich quantitative model. Modeling voluntary bequests, and realistically calibrating them, not only generates more wealth dispersion at retirement and reduces the correlation between retirement wealth and lifetime income, but also generates a skewed bequest distribution that is close to the one in the observed data.
Published: De Nardi, Mariacristina & Yang, Fang, 2014. "Bequests and heterogeneity in retirement wealth," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 182-196. citation courtesy of