Maximum State Income Tax Rates 1977-1993.

The actual income tax rate on a taxpayer is endogenous, i.e. it depends upon his income. So any regression explaining income (or labor supply or charitable giving...) in terms of after-tax prices should be wary of using the actual tax rate directly as an explanatory variable. But variation in state tax laws across states and years is exogenous to individual labor supply and realization decisions. So an instumental variable that depends only on the state law (or, to a lesser extent, on the year), and not on the individual has the potential to be a valid instrument.

Sometimes the maximum income tax rate by state and year is a nice independent variable in a cross-state tax-price regression. Although not representative of typical marginal rates, it is representative of tax rates on property income and it is independent of individual decisions.

Available here is a list of tax rates by year and state for the maximum state tax. It is calculated from a run of the TAXSIM model.

This calculation was done for Josh Lerner of the Harvard Business School, and reports the maximum tax rate for an additional $1000 of income on an initial $250,000 of wage income. The taxpayer is assumed to be married and filing jointly. No personal deductions are included except for the state income tax on the federal return and the federal tax on the state return (where allowed). To avoid a simultaneous determination, the calculation is merely iterated to a fixed point. This deductibility would be the main difference between these rates and the maximum bracket rate which might be published in a summary of state tax laws.


List of State Identifiers: 0.no state tax 1.alabama 2.alaska 3.arizona 4.arkansas 5.california 6.colorado 7.conn 8.delaware 9.dc 10.florida 11.georgia 12.hawaii 13.idaho 14.illinois 15.indiana 16.iowa 17.kansas 18.kentucky 19.louisiana 20.maine 21.maryland 22.mass 23.michigan 24.minnesota 25.mississippi 26.missouri 27.montana 28.nebraska 29.nevada 30.nh 31.nj 32.nm 33.ny 34.nc 35.nd 36.ohio 37.oklahoma 38.oregon 39.penn 40.ri 41.sc 42.sd 43.tenn. 44.texas 45.utah 46.vermont 47.virginia 48.washington 49.wv 50.wisconsin 51.wyoming 52.other

If you suspect any case has been calculated incorrectly, please extract that case (or a exemplar, if there are many cases) and email it to me with a statement of how you think the tax calculation ought to have been made. I will get back to you within a couple of days with an explanation or a fix.

For more information about TAXSIM see:

Feenberg, Daniel Richard, and Elizabeth Coutts, An Introduction to the TAXSIM Model, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management vol 12 no 1, Winter 1993, pages 189-194.

This paper and this URL (http://www.nber.org/~taxsim)should be cited if any results from TAXSIM are circulated or published.

Daniel Feenberg
NBER
1050 Mass Ave.
Cambridge MA 02138
617-588-0343
feenberg@nber.org


NBER home page | TAXSIM home page