TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hendershott,Patric H.
AU  - Ling,David C.
TI  - Tax Reform and Housing
JF  - National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series
VL  - No. 1524
PY  - 1985
Y2  - October 1985
UR  - http://www.nber.org/papers/w1524
L1  - http://www.nber.org/papers/w1524.pdf
N1  - Author contact info:
Patric H. Hendershott
Fisher Hall
Ohio State University
2100 Neil Avenue
Columbus, OH 43210
Tel: 218/963-1393
Fax: 218/963-9484
E-Mail: hendershott.2@osu.edu
AB  - Current tax law provides tax advantages to owner-occupied housing that increase with a household's income. This well understood fact has led to periodic proposals to substitute a tax credit equal to, say, 25 percent of housing-related expenses for their current deductibility. Because all of the tax reforms considered in this paper (Hall-Rabushka, Kemp-Kasten and Bradley-Gephardt) move toward a flat rate schedule, they all will sharply reduce the tax-advantages of owner-occupied housing to higher income households relative to lower income households. In fact, our analysis suggests that all reforms will lower the price of obtaining housing services from owner-occupied housing for these households and raise it for higher-income households. The "breakeven" income at which the price of these housing services would be unchanged is about $55,000 for Kemp-Kasten and Hall-Rabushka probably $10,000 less for Bradley-Gephardt. The price of renting housing should rise under all reforms, probably by 5 to 10 percent. In combination with the decline in the price of obtaining housing services for middle and lower income households, this should give a signficant boost to homeownership. Under Kemp-Kasten, ownership rates will rise for four-member households with AGI (as renters) of under $60,000; for higher income households ownership could decline marginally. The breakeven income level is roughly $40,000 for Bradley-Gephardt and $35,000 or Hall-Rabushka.
ER  -