"c VAR 0261 14060 CE TRAL 3R 887-915 MD= 1E-37 " "c REF 0261 LOC 2310 WIDTH 9 DK 37 COL 44-52 " "c EXP DEC= 1 " "c " "c RATIO OF RESERVES TO NET DEPOSITS, NATIONAL BANKS, CENTRAL " "c RESERVE CITIES " "c ---------------------------------------------------------- " "c " "c NBER SERIES: 14060 " "c AREA COVERED: U.S. " "c UNITS: PERCENT " "c ANNUAL COVERAGE: NONE " "c QUARTERLY COVERAGE: NONE " "c MONTHLY COVERAGE: SCATTERED COVERAGE FOR 1887-1915; SEE " "c NOTE " "c SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT: NONE " "c SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORT OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY, " "c 1888 AND FOLLOWING YEARS. " "c " "c NOTES: DATA FOR MAY 1887-AUGUST 1892 WERE COMPUTED BY NBER; " "c THEREAFTER DATA ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM THE SOURCE. " "c BEGINNING IN APRIL 1902, THE TABLE HEADING CHANGED FROM " "c "RESERVE HELD -- RATIO OF RESERVE" TO "CASH ON HAND, DUE DUE " "c FROM RESERVE AGENTS, AND IN THE REDEMPTION FUND -- PERCENT". " "c DATA REMAIN COMPARABLE THROUGHOUT. " "c MONTHLY COVERAGE VARIES FROM YEAR TO YEAR. EXCEPT FOR " "c 1887, WHICH ONLY HAS DATA FOR FOUR MONTHS, ALL YEARS FROM " "c 1888-1914 HAVE SCATTERED FIVE MONTH COVERAGE. SIX MONTHS " "c ARE PRESENTED FOR 1915. " "c THE FIRST AND FIFTH CALL DATES THROUGH THE FIRST CALL " "c DATE OF 1892 WERE COMPUTED AS FOLLOWS: FOR DEPOSITS -- THE " "c AMOUNT OF RESERVE REQUIRED, 25% OF NET DEPOSITS WERE SUMMED " "c FOR NEW YORK CITY, CHICAGO, AND ST. LOUIS AND THEN " "c MULTIPLIED BY FOUR (SEE TABLE ON P. 191 OF THE 1888 REPORT); " "c FOR RESERVES HELD -- RESERVES HELD, OTHER RESERVE CITIES " "c (1888, P. 190) WERE DEDUCTED FROM RESERVES HELD, ALL RESERVE " "c CITIES (1888, P. 195). " "c FOR THE THREE MIDDLE DATES THROUGH JULY 1892, RESERVES " "c HELD FOR NEW YORK CITY, CHICAGO, AND ST. LOUIS WERE SUMMED; " "c NET DEPOSITS FOR THE THREE CITIES WERE SUMMED; AND THE RATIO " "c WAS COMPUTED (1888, P. 180). " "c " "c CHECKED MANUALLY; CORRECTED 2/8/94. " "c " "c ............................................................... "